Edward Kamont
EIC Match Stats
8cards
0wins
0top-3
460-2best EIC
91-1best OH
94-1best Sit
96-0best 300
189-4best 600
Best 5 EIC avg 443.0
Performance
How the ratings work
- ATC Rating
- On the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of your best 5 Card Ratings from the last 18 months. You need 5 rated cards to be ranked. A year's Rating is your ATC Rating at the end of that season (the 18 months to 31 Dec; the current year uses 30 Sep until 31 Dec).
- 80-Shot Rating
- The same as the ATC Rating but for 800-point (80-shot) matches like Games Cup days and 800 aggregates. Best 5 in the last 18 months.
- Best 10 Avg
- The average of your best 10 totals over 18 months (EIC and NTI cards for EIC, 800-point cards for 80-shot). The current year runs 1 Jul last year to today; past years run 1 Jul to 31 Dec. Field beaten, consistency and X counts use the same 10 cards. The change compares it with the year before.
- Stage Averages
- The average of your best 10 scores and their X count in each stage over the same 18 months, kept separate for EIC (EIC, NTI and same-length President’s stages) and 80-shot.
- Recent Form
- The average of your last 5 Card Ratings, next to your ATC Rating.
- Field Rating
- How strong the match was, on the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of the top 10 entrants' prior-year EIC averages, set before anyone shoots. A match needs at least 5 rated entrants to get one.
- Card Rating
- Your score adjusted for the day. It's your score plus the field's prior-year average, minus what those top 10 shooters actually averaged that day. A tough day adds points and an easy day takes some away. It tops out at 500.
- Consistency (±)
- How much your scores swing from match to match. It's the standard deviation of your best 10 totals over 18 months, so lower is better. ±5 means your scores usually land within about 5 points of your average.
- Beat
- The average share of the field you finished ahead of in your best 10 cards over 18 months. 94% means you beat about 94% of the other shooters each time. A win is 100%.
- Rival
- A shooter at your level (same Distinguished status, a Perry regular like you, and an ATC Rating within 5 points of yours) you've shot at least 10 matches with, whose scores are closest to yours.
—EIC ATC Rating · 0 of 5 cards
435.4EIC avg · last 5
±20.9consistency · last 5
4.2X per 50 · last 5
Excellence-in-Competition Matches
| Year | Match | Finish | OH | Sit | 300 | 600 | Total | Field Rating | Card Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE HIGH POWER EIC · 1 JUL 1998 | 88-1 | 93-0 | 88-0 | 162-3 | 431-4 | 464.1 | 429.1 | |
| 1997 | NASHUA / NE REGIONAL EIC · 6 JUL 1997 | 91-0 | 88-0 | 96-0 | 185-2 | 460-2 | 451.9 | 445.7 | |
| 1995 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 2 JUL 1995 | 89-1 | 94-1 | 82-0 | 184-3 | 449-5 | 467.1 | 449.4 | |
| 1994 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 28 AUG 1994 | 89-3 | 66-0 | 72-0 | 178-2 | 405-5 | 459.7 | 406.0 | |
| 1993 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 5 JUL 1993 | 85-1 | 92-2 | 86-0 | 169-2 | 432-5 | 456.8 | 428.4 | |
| 1992 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 23 AUG 1992 (TWO PAGES) | 86-0 | 93-0 | 95-0 | 169-3 | 443-3 | — | — | |
| 1992 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 5 JUL 1992 | 85-1 | 89-1 | 74-0 | 174-2 | 422-4 | — | — | |
| 1991 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 14 JUL 1991 (TWO PAGES) | 91-1 | 86-1 | 66-0 | 189-4 | 425-5 | — | — |