Kevin Mathis
CMP #36394
Distinguished Rifleman #2371 — 2017
EIC Match Stats
14cards
1wins
6top-3
479-11best EIC
96-1best OH
100-2best Sit
100-1best 300
192-7best 600
Best 5 EIC avg 476.6
Performance
How the ratings work
- ATC Rating
- On the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of your best 5 Card Ratings from the last 18 months. You need 5 rated cards to be ranked. A year's Rating is your ATC Rating at the end of that season (the 18 months to 31 Dec; the current year uses 30 Sep until 31 Dec).
- 80-Shot Rating
- The same as the ATC Rating but for 800-point (80-shot) matches like Games Cup days and 800 aggregates. Best 5 in the last 18 months.
- Best 10 Avg
- The average of your best 10 totals over 18 months (EIC and NTI cards for EIC, 800-point cards for 80-shot). The current year runs 1 Jul last year to today; past years run 1 Jul to 31 Dec. Field beaten, consistency and X counts use the same 10 cards. The change compares it with the year before.
- Stage Averages
- The average of your best 10 scores and their X count in each stage over the same 18 months, kept separate for EIC (EIC, NTI and same-length President’s stages) and 80-shot.
- Recent Form
- The average of your last 5 Card Ratings, next to your ATC Rating.
- Field Rating
- How strong the match was, on the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of the top 10 entrants' prior-year EIC averages, set before anyone shoots. A match needs at least 5 rated entrants to get one.
- Card Rating
- Your score adjusted for the day. It's your score plus the field's prior-year average, minus what those top 10 shooters actually averaged that day. A tough day adds points and an easy day takes some away. It tops out at 500.
- Consistency (±)
- How much your scores swing from match to match. It's the standard deviation of your best 10 totals over 18 months, so lower is better. ±5 means your scores usually land within about 5 points of your average.
- Beat
- The average share of the field you finished ahead of in your best 10 cards over 18 months. 94% means you beat about 94% of the other shooters each time. A win is 100%.
- Rival
- A shooter at your level (same Distinguished status, a Perry regular like you, and an ATC Rating within 5 points of yours) you've shot at least 10 matches with, whose scores are closest to yours.
—EIC ATC Rating · 0 of 5 cards
472.6EIC avg · last 5
±8.9consistency · last 5
9.6X per 50 · last 5
38leg points
Full Performance
| Year | Cards | Best 10 · 18 mo | Change | X/50 | ± | Beat | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 | 476.5 | +7.9 (+1.7%) | 10.0 | ±2.1 | — | — |
| 2017 | 7 | 468.6 | +2.3 (+0.5%) | 9.4 | ±8.1 | — | 458.7 |
| 2016 | 4 | 466.3 | — | 10.0 | ±4.3 | — | — |
| 2015 | 2 | not rated | |||||
| 2014 | 2 | not rated | |||||
| 2013 | 2 | not rated | |||||
| 2012 | 2 | not rated | |||||
| 2011 | 2 | not rated | |||||
| 2010 | 1 | not rated | |||||
Distinguished Rifleman Badge #2371
6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 8 = 38 points · 6 legs
Highlights
| Pl | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | READING EIC · 2017 (CMP 15462) | 474-9 |
| 2nd | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 11 SEP 2017 | 479-11 |
| 2nd | READING EIC · 27 AUG 2017 | 476-10 |
| 3rd | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 11 SEP 2016 | 468-13 |
| 3rd | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 6 SEP 2015 | 471-12 |
| 3rd | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 12 SEP 2010 | 475-6 |
EIC Leg Points
Distinguished Rifleman Badge #2371 · 10 Sep 2017 · 38 points
| Date | Match | Finish | Score | Points | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Sep 2010 | Scarborough F&G EIC | 3 of 14 | 475-6 | 6 | 6 |
| 9 Sep 2012 | Scarborough F&G EIC | 4 of 17 | 476-13 | 6 | 12 |
| 6 Sep 2015 | Scarborough F&G EIC | 3 of 13 | 471-12 | 6 | 18 |
| 11 Sep 2016 | Scarborough F&G EIC | 3 of 13 | 468-13 | 6 | 24 |
| 6 Aug 2017 | Reading EIC · 2017 (CMP 15462) | 1 of 15 | 474-9 | 6 | 30 |
| 11 Sep 2017 | Scarborough F&G EIC | 2 of 21 | 479-11 | 8 | 38 |
Excellence-in-Competition Matches
| Year | Match | Finish | OH | Sit | 300 | 600 | Total | Field Rating | Card Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 9 SEP 2018 | 94-1 | 99-1 | 98-4 | 186-4 | 477-10 | 461.3 | 464.5 | |
| 2017 | READING EIC · 11 JUN 2017 | 88-0 | 93-2 | 94-2 | 182-4 | 457-8 | 465.6 | 455.0 | |
| 2017 | READING EIC · 2017 (CMP 15462) | 93-1 | 97-2 | 96-2 | 188-4 | 474-9 | 447.2 | 458.8 | |
| 2017 | READING EIC · 27 AUG 2017 | 96-0 | 98-2 | 96-3 | 186-5 | 476-10 | 431.6 | 455.0 | |
| 2017 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 11 SEP 2017 | 93-0 | 95-1 | 99-3 | 192-7 | 479-11 | 452.5 | 465.8 | |
| 2016 | NASHUA F&G EIC · 25 SEP 2016 | 92-1 | 98-3 | 94-0 | 181-3 | 465-7 | 449.3 | 456.9 | |
| 2016 | NE GAMES EIC GAMES 2016 | 90-1 | 100-2 | 89-0 | 182-5 | 461-8 | 451.9 | 456.6 | |
| 2016 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 11 SEP 2016 | 89-1 | 97-3 | 96-3 | 186-6 | 468-13 | 439.7 | 455.5 | |
| 2015 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 6 SEP 2015 | 92-3 | 96-1 | 96-2 | 187-6 | 471-12 | 454.7 | 468.3 | |
| 2014 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 8 SEP 2014 | 94-2 | 99-3 | 89-3 | 187-2 | 469-10 | 459.1 | 467.8 | |
| 2013 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 8 SEP 2013 | 93-1 | 96-4 | 97-3 | 178-2 | 464-10 | 461.7 | 462.0 | |
| 2012 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 9 SEP 2012 | 90-4 | 99-4 | 96-2 | 191-3 | 476-13 | 466.6 | 473.0 | |
| 2011 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 11 SEP 2011 | 88-0 | 97-3 | 96-0 | 191-7 | 472-10 | 472.1 | 475.7 | |
| 2010 | SCARBOROUGH F&G EIC · 12 SEP 2010 | 96-1 | 91-0 | 100-1 | 188-4 | 475-6 | 463.8 | 472.8 |