Michael Glinski
EIC Match Stats
5cards
2wins
4top-3
491-22best EIC
95-3best OH
100-5best Sit
100-4best 300
197-9best 600
Best 5 EIC avg 474.8
Performance
How the ratings work
- ATC Rating
- On the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of your best 5 Card Ratings from the last 18 months. You need 5 rated cards to be ranked. A year's Rating is your ATC Rating at the end of that season (the 18 months to 31 Dec; the current year uses 30 Sep until 31 Dec).
- 80-Shot Rating
- The same as the ATC Rating but for 800-point (80-shot) matches like Games Cup days and 800 aggregates. Best 5 in the last 18 months.
- Best 10 Avg
- The average of your best 10 totals over 18 months (EIC and NTI cards for EIC, 800-point cards for 80-shot). The current year runs 1 Jul last year to today; past years run 1 Jul to 31 Dec. Field beaten, consistency and X counts use the same 10 cards. The change compares it with the year before.
- Stage Averages
- The average of your best 10 scores and their X count in each stage over the same 18 months, kept separate for EIC (EIC, NTI and same-length President’s stages) and 80-shot.
- Recent Form
- The average of your last 5 Card Ratings, next to your ATC Rating.
- Field Rating
- How strong the match was, on the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of the top 10 entrants' prior-year EIC averages, set before anyone shoots. A match needs at least 5 rated entrants to get one.
- Card Rating
- Your score adjusted for the day. It's your score plus the field's prior-year average, minus what those top 10 shooters actually averaged that day. A tough day adds points and an easy day takes some away. It tops out at 500.
- Consistency (±)
- How much your scores swing from match to match. It's the standard deviation of your best 10 totals over 18 months, so lower is better. ±5 means your scores usually land within about 5 points of your average.
- Beat
- The average share of the field you finished ahead of in your best 10 cards over 18 months. 94% means you beat about 94% of the other shooters each time. A win is 100%.
- Rival
- A shooter at your level (same Distinguished status, a Perry regular like you, and an ATC Rating within 5 points of yours) you've shot at least 10 matches with, whose scores are closest to yours.
—EIC ATC Rating · 0 of 5 cards
474.8EIC avg · last 5
86%field beaten · last 5
±20.0consistency · last 5
10.0X per 50 · last 5
Full Performance
| Year | Cards | Best 10 · 18 mo | Change | X/50 | ± | Beat | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 4 | 483.5 | — | 12.3 | ±5.4 | 97% | — |
| 2002 | 1 | not rated | |||||
100%Largest-field win · NASHUA / NFGA EIC · 31 AUG 2003 · 1 of 40
All results with a place: 2003 97% · 2002 41%
Records
| Record | Score |
|---|---|
| Nashua Fish & Game Non-distinguished Range Record (EIC) | 491-22 |
Highlights
| Pl | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 24 AUG 2003 | 480-9 |
| 1st | NASHUA / NFGA EIC · 31 AUG 2003 | 491-22 |
| 2nd | NASHUA / NH SR CHAMP EIC · 19 OCT 2003 | 484-11 |
| 3rd | READING EIC · 8 JUN 2003 | 479-7 |
Excellence-in-Competition Matches
| Year | Match | Finish | OH | Sit | 300 | 600 | Aggregate | Field Rating | Card Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | NASHUA / NFGA EIC · 31 AUG 2003 | 1 of 40 | 95-3 | 100-5 | 99-5 | 197-9 | 491-22 | 442.8 | 481.2 |
| 2003 | NASHUA / NH SR CHAMP EIC · 19 OCT 2003 | 2 of 25 | 94-0 | 97-0 | 100-4 | 193-7 | 484-11 | — | — |
| 2003 | READING EIC · 8 JUN 2003 | 3 of 23 | 94-0 | 99-2 | 94-0 | 192-5 | 479-7 | 462.0 | 477.0 |
| 2003 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 24 AUG 2003 | 1 of 19 | 93-2 | 98-3 | 99-0 | 190-4 | 480-9 | — | — |
| 2002 | MASSACHUSETTS HIGH POWER CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 9 JUN 2002 | 10 of 17 | 83-0 | 91-0 | 92-0 | 174-1 | 440-1 | — | — |
Local Matches — 1
| Date | Match | Finish | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Jun 2002 | MASSACHUSETTS STATE HIGH POWER CHAMPIONSHIP · 8 JUN 2002 | 24 of 38 | 906-7 |