Robert Slatkavitz
EIC Match Stats
11cards
0wins
0top-3
471-19best EIC
91-2best OH
98-2best Sit
98-5best 300
198-12best 600
Best 5 EIC avg 462.6
Performance
How the ratings work
- ATC Rating
- On the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of your best 5 Card Ratings from the last 18 months. You need 5 rated cards to be ranked. A year's Rating is your ATC Rating at the end of that season (the 18 months to 31 Dec; the current year uses 30 Sep until 31 Dec).
- 80-Shot Rating
- The same as the ATC Rating but for 800-point (80-shot) matches like Games Cup days and 800 aggregates. Best 5 in the last 18 months.
- Best 10 Avg
- The average of your best 10 totals over 18 months (EIC and NTI cards for EIC, 800-point cards for 80-shot). The current year runs 1 Jul last year to today; past years run 1 Jul to 31 Dec. Field beaten, consistency and X counts use the same 10 cards. The change compares it with the year before.
- Stage Averages
- The average of your best 10 scores and their X count in each stage over the same 18 months, kept separate for EIC (EIC, NTI and same-length President’s stages) and 80-shot.
- Recent Form
- The average of your last 5 Card Ratings, next to your ATC Rating.
- Field Rating
- How strong the match was, on the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of the top 10 entrants' prior-year EIC averages, set before anyone shoots. A match needs at least 5 rated entrants to get one.
- Card Rating
- Your score adjusted for the day. It's your score plus the field's prior-year average, minus what those top 10 shooters actually averaged that day. A tough day adds points and an easy day takes some away. It tops out at 500.
- Consistency (±)
- How much your scores swing from match to match. It's the standard deviation of your best 10 totals over 18 months, so lower is better. ±5 means your scores usually land within about 5 points of your average.
- Beat
- The average share of the field you finished ahead of in your best 10 cards over 18 months. 94% means you beat about 94% of the other shooters each time. A win is 100%.
- Rival
- A shooter at your level (same Distinguished status, a Perry regular like you, and an ATC Rating within 5 points of yours) you've shot at least 10 matches with, whose scores are closest to yours.
—EIC ATC Rating · 0 of 5 cards
462.0EIC avg · last 5
54%field beaten · last 5
±8.4consistency · last 5
8.2X per 50 · last 5
Excellence-in-Competition Matches
| Year | Match | Finish | OH | Sit | 300 | 600 | Aggregate | Field Rating | Card Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | NE REGIONAL EIC · MERRIMACK NH · 1 JUL 2001 | 14 of 48 | 87-0 | 98-2 | DNF | 183-3 | 368-5 | ||
| 2000 | NASHUA / NH SR CHAMP EIC · 1 OCT 2000 | 17 of 21 | 87-0 | 91-0 | 88-0 | 187-2 | 453-2 | 461.5 | 446.8 |
| 2000 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 27 AUG 2000 | 9 of 20 | 84-1 | 89-0 | 94-0 | 190-5 | 457-6 | — | — |
| 1999 | NASHUA / NFGA EIC · 3 OCT 1999 | 7 of 24 | 79-2 | 98-2 | 96-3 | 198-12 | 471-19 | — | — |
| 1998 | NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE HIGH POWER EIC · 1 JUL 1998 | 26 of 43 | 89-1 | 93-1 | 94-0 | 182-4 | 458-6 | 464.1 | 456.1 |
| 1997 | NASHUA / NE REGIONAL EIC · 6 JUL 1997 | 10 of 40 | 91-2 | 91-1 | 96-1 | 193-4 | 471-8 | 451.9 | 456.7 |
| 1997 | READING EIC · MASS SR NBPRP 13 JUL 1997 | 18 of 40 | 83-0 | 95-2 | 98-5 | 180-0 | 456-7 | — | — |
| 1994 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 3 JUL 1994 | 40 of 60 | 90-1 | 88-0 | 78-0 | 182-4 | 438-5 | 460.5 | 436.6 |
| 1993 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 5 JUL 1993 | 35 of 74 | 85-0 | 88-0 | 96-1 | 180-2 | 449-3 | 456.8 | 445.4 |
| 1992 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 23 AUG 1992 (TWO PAGES) | 43 of 71 | 84-0 | 92-0 | 96-3 | 170-0 | 442-3 | — | — |
| 1992 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 5 JUL 1992 | 8 of 74 | 88-1 | 94-2 | 90-0 | 183-3 | 455-6 | — | — |
Local Matches — 1
| Date | Match | Finish | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 May 1997 | Nashua 80 Shot HP 11 May 1997 | 4 of 12 | 729 |