Ronald Champagne
Distinguished Rifleman #1168 — 1995
EIC Match Stats
11cards
4wins
5top-3
489-19best EIC
96-4best OH
100-5best Sit
100-3best 300
197-8best 600
Best 5 EIC avg 484.2
Performance
How the ratings work
- ATC Rating
- On the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of your best 5 Card Ratings from the last 18 months. You need 5 rated cards to be ranked. A year's Rating is your ATC Rating at the end of that season (the 18 months to 31 Dec; the current year uses 30 Sep until 31 Dec).
- 80-Shot Rating
- The same as the ATC Rating but for 800-point (80-shot) matches like Games Cup days and 800 aggregates. Best 5 in the last 18 months.
- Best 10 Avg
- The average of your best 10 totals over 18 months (EIC and NTI cards for EIC, 800-point cards for 80-shot). The current year runs 1 Jul last year to today; past years run 1 Jul to 31 Dec. Field beaten, consistency and X counts use the same 10 cards. The change compares it with the year before.
- Stage Averages
- The average of your best 10 scores and their X count in each stage over the same 18 months, kept separate for EIC (EIC, NTI and same-length President’s stages) and 80-shot.
- Recent Form
- The average of your last 5 Card Ratings, next to your ATC Rating.
- Field Rating
- How strong the match was, on the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of the top 10 entrants' prior-year EIC averages, set before anyone shoots. A match needs at least 5 rated entrants to get one.
- Card Rating
- Your score adjusted for the day. It's your score plus the field's prior-year average, minus what those top 10 shooters actually averaged that day. A tough day adds points and an easy day takes some away. It tops out at 500.
- Consistency (±)
- How much your scores swing from match to match. It's the standard deviation of your best 10 totals over 18 months, so lower is better. ±5 means your scores usually land within about 5 points of your average.
- Beat
- The average share of the field you finished ahead of in your best 10 cards over 18 months. 94% means you beat about 94% of the other shooters each time. A win is 100%.
- Rival
- A shooter at your level (same Distinguished status, a Perry regular like you, and an ATC Rating within 5 points of yours) you've shot at least 10 matches with, whose scores are closest to yours.
—EIC ATC Rating · 0 of 5 cards
484.2EIC avg · last 5
99%field beaten · last 5
±5.0consistency · last 5
15.2X per 50 · last 5
Full Performance
100%Largest-field win · READING REGIONAL EIC · 2 JUL 1995 · 1 of 60
All results with a place: 1998 95% · 1997 100% · 1996 100% · 1995 100%
Highlights
| Pl | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | NASHUA / NE REGIONAL EIC · 6 JUL 1997 | 487-15 |
| 1st | READING EIC · 7 JUL 1996 | 485-19 |
| 1st | READING REGIONAL EIC · 2 JUL 1995 | 489-19 |
| 1st | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 28 AUG 1994 | 476-10 |
| 3rd | NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE HIGH POWER EIC · 1 JUL 1998 | 484-13 |
Excellence-in-Competition Matches
| Year | Match | Finish | OH | Sit | 300 | 600 | Aggregate | Field Rating | Card Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE HIGH POWER EIC · 1 JUL 1998 | 3 of 43 | 94-3 | 100-4 | 97-0 | 193-6 | 484-13 | 464.1 | 482.1 |
| 1997 | NASHUA / NE REGIONAL EIC · 6 JUL 1997 | 1 of 40 | 94-2 | 100-5 | 100-3 | 193-5 | 487-15 | 451.9 | 472.7 |
| 1996 | READING EIC · 7 JUL 1996 | 1 of 52 | 94-0 | 96-3 | 99-4 | 196-12 | 485-19 | — | — |
| 1995 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 2 JUL 1995 | 1 of 60 | 96-4 | 99-4 | 97-3 | 197-8 | 489-19 | 467.1 | 489.4 |
| 1994 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 28 AUG 1994 | 1 of 35 | 95-1 | 90-0 | 96-0 | 195-9 | 476-10 | 459.7 | 477.0 |
| 1994 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 3 JUL 1994 | 8 of 60 | 95-2 | 97-4 | 98-0 | 182-4 | 472-10 | 460.5 | 470.6 |
| 1993 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 29 AUG 1993 | 20 of 32 | 91-0 | 94-1 | 94-0 | 176-1 | 455-2 | 440.7 | 440.0 |
| 1993 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 5 JUL 1993 | 8 of 74 | 91-1 | 96-0 | 95-1 | 190-7 | 472-9 | 456.8 | 468.4 |
| 1992 | MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 23 AUG 1992 (TWO PAGES) | 48 of 71 | 90-0 | 87-0 | 82-0 | 179-3 | 438-3 | — | — |
| 1992 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 5 JUL 1992 | 28 of 74 | 88-2 | 89-1 | 87-0 | 171-1 | 435-4 | — | — |
| 1972 | READING REGIONAL EIC · 3-4 JUN 1972 | 25 of 48 | 87-0 | 85-0 | 87-2 | 142-2 | 401-4 | — | — |
