Welch

EIC Match Stats

7cards

0wins

1top-3

475-10best EIC

94-0best OH

98-1best Sit

99-5best 300

192-9best 600

Best 5 EIC avg 472.6

Performance

How the ratings work

ATC Rating: On the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of your best 5 Card Ratings from the last 18 months. You need 5 rated cards to be ranked. A year's Rating is your ATC Rating at the end of that season (the 18 months to 31 Dec; the current year uses 30 Sep until 31 Dec).
80-Shot Rating: The same as the ATC Rating but for 800-point (80-shot) matches like Games Cup days and 800 aggregates. Best 5 in the last 18 months.
Best 10 Avg: The average of your best 10 totals over 18 months (EIC and NTI cards for EIC, 800-point cards for 80-shot). The current year runs 1 Jul last year to today; past years run 1 Jul to 31 Dec. Field beaten, consistency and X counts use the same 10 cards. The change compares it with the year before.
Stage Averages: The average of your best 10 scores and their X count in each stage over the same 18 months, kept separate for EIC (EIC, NTI and same-length President’s stages) and 80-shot.
Recent Form: The average of your last 5 Card Ratings, next to your ATC Rating.
Field Rating: How strong the match was, on the same scale as a 500 score. It's the average of the top 10 entrants' prior-year EIC averages, set before anyone shoots. A match needs at least 5 rated entrants to get one.
Card Rating: Your score adjusted for the day. It's your score plus the field's prior-year average, minus what those top 10 shooters actually averaged that day. A tough day adds points and an easy day takes some away. It tops out at 500.
Consistency (±): How much your scores swing from match to match. It's the standard deviation of your best 10 totals over 18 months, so lower is better. ±5 means your scores usually land within about 5 points of your average.
Beat: The average share of the field you finished ahead of in your best 10 cards over 18 months. 94% means you beat about 94% of the other shooters each time. A win is 100%.
Rival: A shooter at your level (same Distinguished status, a Perry regular like you, and an ATC Rating within 5 points of yours) you've shot at least 10 matches with, whose scores are closest to yours.

Summary

—EIC ATC Rating · 0 of 5 cards

471.0EIC avg · last 5

±6.3consistency · last 5

7.6X per 50 · last 5

Full Performance

Year by Year · EIC

Year	Cards	Best 10 · 18 mo	Change	X/50	±	Beat	Rating
2005	3	469.0	−4.3 (−0.9%)	6.3	±7.9	—	—
2004	3	473.3	+1.3 (+0.3%)	9.7	±1.5	—	—
2003	3	472.0	—	8.7	±3.6	—	—
2002	1	not rated

Highlights

Pl	Match	Score
2nd	MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 24 AUG 2003	473-9

Excellence-in-Competition Matches

Year	Match	OH	Sit	300	600	Total	Field Rating	Card Rating
2005	NASHUA / NFGA EIC · 5 SEP 2005	92-1	96-1	97-0	190-4	475-6	—	—
2005	READING EIC · 5 JUN 2005	94-0	97-2	98-0	171-1	460-3	—	—
2004	NASHUA / NFGA EIC · 3 OCT 2004	89-2	97-0	99-5	187-3	472-10	—	—
2003	NASHUA / NFGA EIC · 31 AUG 2003	93-0	97-0	93-1	192-9	475-10	—	—
2003	MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE RIFLE CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 24 AUG 2003	92-1	98-1	96-1	187-6	473-9	—	—
2003	READING EIC · 8 JUN 2003	94-0	96-1	96-3	182-3	468-7	—	—
2002	MASSACHUSETTS HIGH POWER CHAMPIONSHIP EIC · 9 JUN 2002	89-1	98-1	92-2	177-4	456-8	—	—

Local Matches — 7

Year	Match	Finish	Aggregate
2005	New Hampshire State High Power Championship 3 Sep 2005	13 of 57	960
2004	New Hampshire State Service Rifle Championship 2 Oct 2004	3 of 45	776
2003	New Hampshire State High Power Championship 30 Aug 2003	17 of 59	955
2003	Reading 80 Shot HP 24 May 2003	17 of 18	165
2003	New Hampshire State Service Rifle Championship 18 Oct 2003	10 of 39	764
2002	MASSACHUSETTS STATE HIGH POWER CHAMPIONSHIP · 8 JUN 2002	26 of 38	904-13
2002	Reading 80 Shot HP 25 May 2002	19 of 45	748